« Negativlandland | Mix Tape Genius »

Negativland's Mark Hosler on Copyright
May 13, 2006




“You don't get total control.”

Mark Hosler is a founding member of sound collage pioneers Negativland. He talks about their role in creating the Creative Commons sampling license, and on copyright + culture in general. VERY interesting stuff if you're at all interested in intellectual property issues.

If you're not familiar with Negativland, check out this video. They're perhaps most famous for getting sued by U2. I also highly recommend you pick up a copy of No Business, their first cd with no original material whatsoever. Plunderlicious!

Mark Hosler is in Minneapolis for Negativlandland, a group exhibition which opened May 12 at Creative Electric Studios. It's a brilliant exhibit - go check it out on a Saturday, through June 10.

RELATED VIDEO:
Welcome to the Future
Negativlandland
Negativland videos on YouTube

RELATED LINKS:
Negativland web site
Some Assembly Required podcast featuring Negativland songs + interview
Creative Commons -NC Licenses Considered Harmful

Posted by Minnesota Stories on May 13, 2006 11:32 AM

Comments

Excellent. I've been a big fan of these guys for years. I had no idea that they had contributed to CC. Very interesting. Thanks Chuck and see you at Vloggercon!

Posted by: Bill Streeter at May 13, 2006 01:50 PM

Great piece Chuck. It was fascinating to hear Mark's take on IP.

Posted by: Sharyn at May 13, 2006 05:02 PM

ironically, i had an interview with merchant & gould yesterday. what a totally different perspective between the two on IP!

Posted by: honey bunny at May 13, 2006 05:54 PM

Advertising is paid speech.

I must remember that.

:flagged:

Posted by: Dooser at May 14, 2006 07:02 PM

Interesting.

Which license is this on http://creativecommons.org for non-advertising?

Posted by: Enric at May 15, 2006 02:26 AM

I think he's talking about the CC Sampling liscense.

Posted by: Brian R. at May 17, 2006 10:00 AM

I am confused. How is paid advertising different than creating a works for commercial gain?

I still don't understand the problem with the no-derivs cc license. If you want your work to be free for all, then it's a 'no rights reserved' license. Creative Commons gives content creators choice.

It's not only money that might drive individuals to protect their work with a license...it's also the message.

This very video could be remixed to completely change the message that it was intended to convey...maybe even to support the opposite view...would Mark be cool with that?

Don't get me wrong. Furthering cultural art by mixing and mashing bits and peices as a commentary is a great thing. But I don't understand why there is such resistance to a method of allowing people to not participate? (btw, I hardly ever use no-derivs on my work)

This is a great discussion :)

Posted by: Devlon at May 17, 2006 10:02 AM

Devlon -- Mark would be 100% cool with that.

You know how Fair Use overrides all of that, right? If you're using a work in a critique or (perhaps) news situation, it doesn't matter what your CC license says. If you put a work out there, then it's available for critique.

The argument here is that Artistic Use has the same merit.

Posted by: chuck at May 17, 2006 01:41 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

About Minnesota Stories